Kasama

New Year: Life Emerges from Darkness

War criminal Robert McNamara dead at 93

Posted by John Steele on July 6, 2009

Viet_Cong_soldiers

Robert Strange McNamara — major architect of the US war on Vietnam as Defense Secretary under Kennedy and Johnson, before that president of Ford Motor Co., and afterwards president of the World Bank, has finally died.

We welcome comments, memories, and assessments of that pivotal period in history in which McNamara played a major role as strategist of US imperialism.

The picture shows “Viet Cong” soldiers, who battled the B-52s, helicopter gunships, heavy artillery, napalm and carpet-bombing, and the massive armies of the US with the sorts of light armaments shown here. The news story is from AFP.

Former US defense secretary McNamara dies

By Carlos Hamann

WASHINGTON (AFP) — Robert McNamara, the US defense secretary who was one of the main architects of the US war in Vietnam, died Monday, The Washington Post reported. He was 93.

McNamara oversaw the escalation of US war efforts in Vietnam from 1961 to 1968. He was also an early advocate of counter-insurgency operations and a key architect of Cold War nuclear policy.A trained economist, he also helped turn around the Ford auto company in the post-World War II era and then used his talents to improve the image of the World Bank during his long tenure as president from 1968 to 1981.

Brilliant — arrogant, some would say — certain of himself and a whirlwind of energy, McNamara was a key member of president John F. Kennedy’s cabinet, a team famously described as “The Best and the Brightest” in author David Halberstam’s seminal book on the Vietnam war.

But in later years McNamara came to regret his Vietnam role, although he remained silent until the publication of his controversial 1995 memoirs “In Retrospect: The Tragedies and Lessons of Vietnam.”

Top US officials “who participated in the decisions on Vietnam acted according to what we thought were the principles and traditions of this nation,” McNamara wrote.

“We made our decisions in light of those values. Yet we were wrong, terribly wrong. We owe it to future generations to explain why.”

But his term as defense secretary did not start out that way, when Kennedy asked McNamara, then 44, to be his defense secretary soon after the young president was elected.

“I don’t object to its being called McNamara’s war,” he wrote of Vietnam in 1964. “I think it is a very important war and I am pleased to be identified with it and do whatever I can to win it.”

Under McNamara’s watch the US military role in Vietnam escalated from a few hundred US soldiers advising South Vietnam’s military to some 17,000 by 1964.

And US involvement in the war escalated even more dramatically following the Gulf of Tonkin incident that year, in which, based on suspect intelligence reports, the US alleged North Vietnamese torpedo boats had fired on two US destroyers.

President Lyndon B. Johnson — who took over when Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 — ordered retaliatory air strikes on North Vietnam, and the number of US number of soldiers sent to fight in Vietnam had risen to 535,000 by mid-1968.

By the time the war ended in 1975 more than 58,000 US soldiers had been killed, as well as more than three million Vietnamese from the North and South and around 1.5 Laotians and Cambodians.

But McNamara had already left as defense secretary, increasingly at odds with the administration’s policies.

“Although he loyally supported administration policy,” reads his official Pentagon biography, “McNamara gradually became skeptical about whether the war could be won” by sending in more troops and intensifying the bombing.

McNamara “became increasingly reluctant to approve the large force increments requested by the military commanders,” the biography reads.

After years of clashes with Johnson and the top military brass, and facing a growing anti-war movement at home, McNamara resigned in early 1968.

Robert Strange McNamara — the odd middle name was his mother’s maiden name — was born June 9, 1916 in San Francisco, California, the son of a wholesale shoe firm sales manager.

He studied economics and philosophy at the University of California at Berkeley, then obtained a masters degree in business administration at Harvard.

McNamara entered the Army Air Force in 1943. Weak eyesight prevented him from flying, so he worked at an office that analyzed the efficiency of US bombing raids.

After the war he was one of 10 ex-Air Force statisticians that Henry Ford II hired to turn around his automotive company. The team, dubbed the Whiz Kids, turned Ford into the second most popular US auto brand.

McNamara shot up the ranks and become company president — the first ever outside of the Ford family — in November 1960.

One month later he accepted the job as Kennedy’s secretary of defense.

In 1968, when he left the Pentagon, McNamara went on to head the World Bank and “shaped the bank as no one before him,” according to the institution’s official biography.

During his tenure, which ended in 1981, McNamara focused the bank on representing the needs of its developing member countries and aggressively sought funding for development projects.

McNamara “came to the bank brimming with energy, forceful, active, pushing to get things done. He brought with him the firm belief that the problems of the developing world could be solved,” the biography reads.

McNamara also wrote or co-authored 11 books on topics that mainly focused on issues of defense and development, the most recent one in 2001.

17 Responses to “War criminal Robert McNamara dead at 93”

  1. Miles Ahead said

    Robert Strange McNamara–

    “Although he loyally supported administration policy,” reads his official Pentagon biography, “McNamara gradually became skeptical about whether the war could be won” by sending in more troops and intensifying the bombing. [emphasis M.A.]

    McNamara “became increasingly reluctant to approve the large force increments requested by the military commanders,” the biography reads.

    After years of clashes with Johnson and the top military brass, and facing a growing anti-war movement at home, McNamara resigned in early 1968.”

    To me, another “war criminal” who was never brought up before a war crimes tribunal. And instead from his elite position was able to write a book, “ooops, made a mistake” in hopes of salvaging his own legacy. And I can’t help but think that he wouldn’t have even bothered to write a book, had it not been for the massive anti-Vietnam war movement worldwide, and his real concerns of deflecting further criticism of him.

  2. Adrienne said

    Miles, I couldn’t agree more. Have you ever seen the documentary The Fog of War? The whole film consists of McNamara being careful to avoid blaming himself (or anyone else for that matter) for any of the major policy decisions made during his long crime-filled career.

  3. Andrei Mazenov said

    Finally- a celebrity death we can celebrate!

    Also: The Fog of War is a very interesting piece of work- with McNamara often times scrambling for excuses for his actions (even as the star of the film). Good riddance!

  4. Miles Ahead said

    Hi Adrienne…no I haven’t seen “The Fog of War” but at your suggestion just looked it up online, and will read further later. (Actually a film website available.)

    Since you mentioned “The Fog of War” I was remembering “Hearts & Minds” and “In the Year of the Pig,” both having real impact.

    But something else I was thinking about re McNamara–interesting that he resigned in 1968 (only to go onto further wrecking havoc under different guises)–as 1968 was one of the most explosive years during the epoch. E.g., there was Mexico 1968, and France, and while those two world-shaking events were sparked around different demands, the anti-Vietnam war movement definitely was tied in.

    If nothing else, ya have to say McNamara was fairly savvy in his timing, as he must have had the growing sense that he was on “the wrong side of history.” That’s the only “credit” I’m gonna give him.

  5. Miles Ahead said

    a little N.B. on “Fog of War”–just noticed it was a film by Errol Morris who made “Thin Blue Line.”

  6. Zack said

    A song to sign you off to, Rob.

  7. Nothing savvy about him during the Vietnam war years.

    I agree with the direction of the comments. He had awareness of being on the wrong side of history. I think the massive opposition to the Iraq War brought back nightmares to him.

  8. sepia tone said

    It’s lives lived such as these that make a belief in hell so seductive.

    I take no joy in his dying on these terms. A peaceful death as a free man after a long and comfortable life that destroyed so many others. It is at least 46 years more than he should have had…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_Van_Troi#cite_note-greene-1

    It’s the the life of this young man I remember and grieve for after hearing this. As well as the countless millions of others who also perished and suffered as a result of McNamara’s destructive exercise of power.

  9. To me, another “war criminal” who was never brought up before a war crimes tribunal.

    How many American war criminals above the rank of lieutenant ever have had to face charges?

    I can think of a few, the commander at Andersonville (even though he was a Confederate soldier not a Union soldier), John Chivington (he got off) and maybe a few people during the invasion of the Philippines. That’s about it.

    MacNamera wasn’t the worst of the Vietnam war criminals (that would have been Walt Rostow or Nixon) any more than Adolf Eichmann was the worst of the Nazis. But MacNamera WAS the American Eichmann. He was “the banality of evil” personified, the man who tried to apply corporate America’s numbers game to the dead in Vietnam.

    Later on in life, he turned from the American Eichmann into the American Albert Speer, the intellectual and tried to distance himself from the crimes he was personally involved in. The fact that he was an intellectual who was willing to at least play at being “wrong” and “misguided” gave him access to the elite media.

    Oh well, so much for my obituary of MacNamera.

  10. Vietnam was before my time, but here’s one thing I’ve noticed too.

    2004 was a watershed date as far as historical memory goes.

    When I was young, I remember some of the right-wing revisionist movies (like “The Deer Hunter”) and some of the more critical movies (like “Boys in Company C”). I also remember even during the Reagan years, an anti-militarism that was fairly mainstream.

    But the right was steadily chipping away while the left had gone asleep.

    Then came 2004. John Kerry decided he would hide his background as an anti-war protester and run on his being a “war hero”. The right sensed fear and jumped all over it and used it (along with the post 9/11 militarism) to bring the “stab in the back” myth back into the mainstream.

    So ironically, it was Kerry more than MacNamera who allowed the truth about the Vietnam War to be obscured.

  11. At this hour of Mr. McNamara’s death I direct your attention to an elegy for President Kennedy:
    Limousine, Midnight Blue in which the following lines occur:

    “Before you tapped him / for Defense, McNamara ran Ford Motor Co., / and if we”re lucky, he”s got more bold new ideas.:”

    …as well as these lines:

    “Ask not what the tolling bell can do for you, / ask what it matters in eternity. / Consider the dying stars, / how they bring unfinished business to a perfect end.”

    For 8 sample poems, each with its own little video, see the site above (http://www.jameyhecht.com/Site/HOME.html). Thank you.

  12. Miles Ahead said

    Of course there haven’t been real massive public war crimes tribunals (or a Nuremberg trial) conducted, but with the death of Robt. MacNamara, we’re conducting our own mini-tribunal. And as part of that, and while my knee-jerk reaction this morning when learning of MacNamara’s demise was “good riddance”, I don’t think it is exactly a question of celebration, although I must admit, am still gleeful that Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond have bit the dust.

    (BTW, as I’m sure Stanley knows, Eichmann—the “The Man in the Glass Booth”– was captured, tried and executed by the Israelis.)

    That MacNamara could slink away pretty unscathed for his heinous (and strategic) crimes, then become a mucky muck in the World Bank, and later sorta kinda repent (from some penthouse), is to me more at the heart of what his death represents. Hell, Oliver North is now a “political commentator” on Fox and wrote a “best seller” (most copies probably bought by Nancy Reagan—after finishing her read of “Dick & Jane.”).

    When Pinochet was finally extradited back to Chile, and while justifiably thoroughly hated, some in the Chilean government said he couldn’t stand trial because he was too old and infirm. This practically caused riots in Chile, but the sucker died before the people could actually bring him to trial. And even though deader-than-kelseys, Pinochet’s crimes against humanity haven’t been forgotten, most especially by the Chilean people.

    IMO, dead or alive, the likes of Pinochet and MacNamara and their crimes is what needs to be exposed and remembered. W was still checking in with Henry Kissinger periodically during his presidency re foreign policy—Kissinger—don’t get me started. (This is all starting to sound like the real “axis of evil”, don’t ya think?)

    As far as comparing John Kerry with MacNamara, at least in terms of “obscuring the truth” about Vietnam, I think that is a stretch. First of all, Kerry was not Secretary of Defense, calling the shots, and setting policy in the Vietnam War and era. And I don’t think that John Kerry necessarily tried to hide his change of heart and anti-war sentiments—although at first, in his campaign, he wasn’t exactly ranting against the Vietnam War—but was more so, showing off his medals. What I think Kerry did was misjudge and underestimate the Right, and ended up being swift-boated anyway—regardless of his ultimate stand against the war and his membership in VVAW.

    To me, MacNamara’s death serves as a sore reminder…that we are never complacent about these criminals and their various vicious crimes, and that includes and is against those who are responsible for the Iraq war while, seemingly the U.S. is “withdrawing” troops from Iraq’s cities (and deploying many of those same troops to Afghanistan and Pakistan).

  13. W was still checking in with Henry Kissinger periodically during his presidency re foreign policy

    Worse than that, Kissinger was the original choice to head the 9/11 Commission.

    As far as comparing John Kerry with MacNamara, at least in terms of “obscuring the truth” about Vietnam, I think that is a stretch. First of all, Kerry was not Secretary of Defense, calling the shots, and setting policy in the Vietnam War and era.

    Kerry’s presidential campaign in 2004 was kind of the final nail in the coffin of the anti-vietnam-war movement. I guess 9/11 had more to do with it than Kerry. I remember in those “MIA” booths near the Vietnam Memorial in 2003 and 2004 seeing all kind of outright out of the closet racist propaganda (“9/11 Terrorist Hunting Permits” and the like). Kerry was no war criminal, just a coward. But 2004 was the watershed date.

    That MacNamara could slink away pretty unscathed for his heinous (and strategic) crimes, then become a mucky muck in the World Bank, and later sorta kinda repent (from some penthouse), is to me more at the heart of what his death represents.

    Focusing on McNamara alone and ignoring Johnson, Nixon, Dean Rusk, Stennis, and JFK would be a bit like prosecuting Eichmann and Albert Speer and ignoring Hitler and Goebels.

    Interestingly enough, some of the Kennedy Assassination conspiracy theorists talk about how Kennedy was shot for wanting to end the war in Vietnam. It reminds me a bit of the Holocaust deniers who say things like “well Hitler didn’t know”. Note. I AM NOT SAYING JFK IS AS BAD AS HITLER, just that the top guy often just gets off. Johnson and Nixon were easier to hate than JFK, so they get tagged by history a bit more than JFK does.

    IMO, dead or alive, the likes of Pinochet and MacNamara and their crimes is what needs to be exposed and remembered.

    When the English restored Charles II, they dug up Cromwell out of his grave and did this:

    In 1661, Oliver Cromwell’s body was exhumed from Westminster Abbey, and was subjected to the ritual of a posthumous execution, as were the remains of John Bradshaw and Henry Ireton. (The body of Cromwell’s daughter was allowed to remain buried in the Abbey.) Symbolically, this took place on 30 January; the same date that Charles I had been executed. His body was hanged in chains at Tyburn. Finally, his disinterred body was thrown into a pit, while his severed head was displayed on a pole outside Westminster Hall until 1685. Afterwards the head changed hands several times, including the sale in 1814 to a man named Josiah Henry Wilkinson.

  14. Logan said

    In the midst of all the celebrity deaths lately, this is the only one that actually BRIGHTENED my day. Good riddance to a terrible man.

  15. Adrienne said

    Interesting interview with Noam Chompsky that came out after the release of McNamara’s book:

    A quote from the link:

    QUESTION: On [PBS'] Macneil-Lehrer [Newshour], he now says he had misgivings about the policies.

    CHOMSKY: What were the misgivings? The misgivings were that it might not succeed. Suppose that some Nazi general came around after Stalingrad and said, “I realized after Stalingrad it was a mistake to fight a two-front war, but I did it anyway.” That’s not the Nuremberg defense. That’s not even recognizing that a crime was committed. You’ve got to recognize that a crime was committed before you give a defense. McNamara can’t perceive that. Furthermore, I don’t say that as a criticism of McNamara. He is a dull, narrow technocrat who questioned nothing. He simply accepted the framework of beliefs of the people around him. And that’s their framework. That’s the Kennedy liberals. We cannot commit a crime. It’s contradiction in terms. Anything we do is by necessity not only right, but noble. Therefore, there can’t be a crime.

    If you look at his mea culpa, he’s apologizing to the American people. He sent American soldiers to fight an unwinnable war, which he thought early on was unwinnable. The cost was to the U.S. It tore the country apart. It left people disillusioned and skeptical of the government. That’s the cost. Yes, there were those three million or more Vietnamese who got killed. The Cambodians and Laotians are totally missing from his story. There were a million or so of them. There’s no apology to them.

  16. Mike E said

    Chomsky’s remarks really reflects the thinking of many of us, when MacNamara came forward and tried to rehabilitate himself and even offer himself as a new face and spokesman for the anti-nuclear sentiments. I went to see MacNamara’s utterly shameless and self-indulgent movie of rehabilitation…. “The Fog of War — Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara (2003)” and could barely sit in my seat, and ended up (together with others in the audience) shouting at the screen in anger.

    I mean it was just like some top-level Nazi genocide expert (Himmler, Hess etc.) coming forward in the 1960s with a few self-serving and superficial regrets, and (highly impressed with himself and his contrition) then offering himself as a spokesman for the modern ecological movement.

    The raging personal arrogance of that, the sense of ruling class entitlement, the inability to acknowledge the monstrous crimes he had committed — it was infuriating and revealing. (I recommend seeing that film for many reasons.)

    MacNamara was not just guilty of engineering the mass murder of Vietnam — he had been a key technocrat under the paleo-fascist Gen. Curtis LeMay in the firebombings of Japan during World War 2.

    These killers did for aerial bombing what Adolf Eichmann did for concentration camps — they made mass killing an industrial process — systematically and ruthlessly bringing corporate efficiency and technology to bear (in new ways) on the enterprise of killing civilians in huge numbers for imperialism. They were key architects of the nightmarish “total war” that the U.S. (and others) have been threatening and unleashing ever since.

  17. I mean it was just like some top-level Nazi genocide expert (Himmler, Hess etc.) coming forward in the 1960s with a few self-serving and superficial regrets,

    Sort of like:

    1.) We underestimated the ability of the Soviets to produce T-34s

    2.) We should have been more effective in mobilizing nationalities subject to the Russians against the Soviet Union. We definitely made a mistake not cultivating our contacts among Ukrainian nationalists more effectively.

    3.) While locating our death camps in occupied Poland effectively shield Operation Final Solution from the western media, our heavy handed techniques in rounding up Jews in the west defeated the effect of our careful secrecy in the east.

    4.) We spent too much time bombing the city of London. Our airstrikes should have been more effectively targetted against the British war industry.

    5.) We allowed British propaganda to effectively mobalize public opinion in the United States, unforgivable in the light of the number of German Americans and their lingering bitterness over Wilson’s suppression of German American organizations in the First World War.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>